home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!<UNAUTHENTICATED>+
- From: Michael.Witbrock@cs.cmu.edu
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Ramsey considered dangerous. Why?
- Message-ID: <cedD3uW00j_HIIO5gH@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 2 Sep 92 08:51:06 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.cedD3uW00j_HIIO5gH
- References: <02jn56=.damiel@netcom.com>,
- <34815@cbmvax.commodore.com>
- Organization: Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA
- Lines: 14
- In-Reply-To: <34815@cbmvax.commodore.com>
-
- > Excerpts from netnews.comp.sys.amiga.misc: 2-Sep-92 Re: case #77a.1:
- > -----rw-d.. Michael Sinz@cbmvax.comm (1750)
-
- > >
- > >(cpu-control, ramsey, pp, decigel020, rad:, faccII, fontcachex, star,
- > ^^^^^^
-
- > Word to the wise: This may be a very dangerouse program to run...
- > There is no need to run this as the OS does the "right thing"
-
-
- Dangerous in what way? Fry chips dangerous or crash programs dangerous?
-
- michael
-