home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!corton!sophia!rhea.inria.fr!beust
- From: beust@rhea.inria.fr (Cedric Beust)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
- Subject: Re: MessyDOS....
- Message-ID: <27931@sophia.inria.fr>
- Date: 27 Aug 92 09:23:00 GMT
- References: <?i3wHou-69@atlantis.psu.edu> <mtpins.714809244@icaen.uiowa.edu> <1992Aug26.010654.58396@cc.usu.edu>
- Sender: news@sophia.inria.fr
- Organization: University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis, France
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Aug26.010654.58396@cc.usu.edu>, slbfn@cc.usu.edu writes:
-
- > Or, even better, pick up MultiDOS. Faster! Less-fattening!!!
-
- Faster? Are you sure?
-
- I noticed significant differences of speed between the miscellaneous
- MS-Dos packages available, and if one is faster then the other one
- on a 68000, it may not be so with a 68030.
-
- Could somone publish a comparison of speeds between MSH, CrossDos
- and MultiDos on these two processors?
-
-
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | Cedric BEUST University of Nice |
- | INET: beust@avahi.inria.fr $whoami |
- | UUCP: llaor.unice.fr!arkonis!beust god (personal alias) |
- | // -- "To be, or not to be...", |
- | \\// Only That is illogical, captain! f U cn rd dis |
- | \/ Amiga! -- Spock U mst uz Unix |
- +------------------------------------------------------------------------+
-