home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!barsoom!debet.nhh.no!si0_tb90020
- From: si0_tb90020@debet.nhh.no
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: Re: Some suggestions for OS/2
- Message-ID: <1992Sep3.013828.835@debet.nhh.no>
- Date: 3 Sep 92 01:38:28 MET
- References: <181jlpINNabc@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <3ckn+0p.xtifr@netcom.com> <1992Sep2.081907.10019@cs.brown.edu> <BtyDtC.3q1@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- Organization: Norwegian School of Economics
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <BtyDtC.3q1@news.cso.uiuc.edu>, btf57346@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Byron "Bohr" Faber) writes:
- > Ahh. Shot, with all the ideas you guys seem to have you should just
- > be able to write a new OS.
- >
- > Or you could just buy NT.
- >
- > (Sorry, I just HAD to do it).
- >
- > Byron Faber
- >
- > Os/2 user.
- > --
- > Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest that When the Reader
- > Is Not Directly Observing This Message, It May Cease to Exist
- > or Will Exist Only in a Vague and Undetermined State.
- > Internet: btf57346@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu & btf57346@sumter.cso.uiuc.edu
-
- Why would we do that? According to Mircrosoft NT will run some DOS
- software, and most Windows software (Which probably almost nothing on
- DOS and even worse on Windows).
-
- Terje
-
-