home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / comp / os / os2 / apps / 5771 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-09-01  |  1.1 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!psuvax1!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
  2. From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps
  4. Subject: Re: Softerm (Re: Which is better: pmcomm or te2?)
  5. Message-ID: <1992Sep1.130646.22322@njitgw.njit.edu>
  6. Date: 1 Sep 92 13:06:46 GMT
  7. References: <92Aug29.145122edt.12046@roll.db.toronto.edu> <78726@ut-emx.uucp> <1992Sep1.143045.12825@phillip.edu.au>
  8. Sender: news@njit.edu
  9. Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
  10. Lines: 13
  11. Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Sep1.143045.12825@phillip.edu.au> t9014201@phillip.edu.au writes:
  14. >You mean you UNDERSTAND how to configure this thing?
  15. >It has to be the most confusing program I have ever used.
  16. >PMCOMM is much much simpler.
  17.  
  18. I've configured mine, as well.  I didn't find it hard.  Of course, I'm
  19. familiar with configuring the 1.3EE Communications Manager.  Softterm
  20. appears to be based on this model for configuration.
  21. -- 
  22.    |)  David Charlap           "I don't even represent myself
  23.   /|_  dic5340@hertz.njit.edu   sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
  24.  ((|,)
  25.   ~|~  Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
  26.