home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.apps:5677 comp.os.os2.programmer:4569 comp.os.os2.advocacy:4736
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.apps,comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Path: sparky!uunet!ulowell!news.bbn.com!usc!cs.utexas.edu!hellgate.utah.edu!jaguar.cs.utah.edu!brian
- From: brian%jaguar.cs.utah.edu@cs.utah.edu (Brian Sturgill)
- Subject: No CROSSPOSTING! (was: IS IBM UK STILL IN THE STONE AGE???)
- Date: 29 Aug 92 15:49:43 MDT
- Message-ID: <1992Aug29.154943.10241@hellgate.utah.edu>
- Followup-To: comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
- References: <1992Aug29.104619.1323@dlpinc00.rn.com> <64910@cup.portal.com> <1992Aug29.132709.5155@hellgate.utah.edu> <a2fnl#c.msmith@netcom.com>
- Lines: 17
-
- It has just been pointed out to me that someone started this discussion
- cross-posted. I apologize to those non-advocacy subscribers for having
- to suffer through this. (Next time, somebody yell sooner!) I'm
- redirecting followups to the advocacy group only.
-
- Can we make it a rule that the advocacy group should never be included
- in a cross-posting? In the rare event a posting needs to be sent
- to the advocacy group and another group surely it's sufficient to
- do the post, but in that same post redirect follow-ups just to the advocacy
- group.
-
- Brian
- --
- C. Brian Sturgill *** OS/2 2.0 is for YOU! ***
- University of Utah Microsoft needs some competition, but
- Center for Software Science -I- want to be one of the many using NT.
- brian@cs.utah.edu; CIS: 70363,1373 :-) :-) :-)
-