home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu!ericy
- From: ericy@hal.gnu.ai.mit.edu (Eric Youngdale)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.linux
- Subject: Re: Linux Standards (was: Stabilizing Linux)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug23.235932.20056@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu>
- Date: 23 Aug 92 23:59:32 GMT
- References: <1992Aug16.221736.9732@athena.mit.edu> <1992Aug16.234935.14600@sol.UVic.CA>
- Sender: news@mintaka.lcs.mit.edu
- Organization: /etc/organization
- Lines: 23
-
- In article <1992Aug16.234935.14600@sol.UVic.CA> pmacdona@sanjuan (Peter MacDonald) writes:
- >In article <1992Aug16.221736.9732@athena.mit.edu> tytso@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Ts'o) writes:
- >
- >I've got a great idea. Lets develop a modified mailing list that is split
- >into 10 subgroups: linux-activists0 through linux-activists9. Each person
- >could subscribe to any *one* of them that they like, but here is the catch.
- >Each subscriber would be graded, between 0 and 9, after subscription, based
- >upon the amount they have contributed to the Linux effort. And (Oh, I love
- >this part), we could have a committee that would decide and revise that grade,
- >ya. Linus, I assume, would get an automatic 9. But maybe the committee
- >would decide that that was inappropriate. ;-)
- >
- >Now, whatever level a user subscribed to, he would only receive postings from
- >users >= that grade. ie. subscribing to linux-activists1, would automatically
- >filter out all the zero's (and are there ever a chestfull of them out there
- >to filter).
-
- Hey, I like this idea. I have one suggestion. People at level zero
- who post would have their postings thrown into the bit bucket. :-) Just for
- fun we could send a copy back to the poster so that they think that it was
- really posted.
-
- -Eric
-