home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!kksys.com!edgar!technix!jfw
- From: jfw@technix.mn.org (Jerry Wallace)
- Subject: Re: ?'s about Class 1 & Class 2 fax
- Message-ID: <1992Aug29.125132.592@technix.mn.org>
- Organization: Private System - Saint Paul, MN
- References: <1992Aug25.055903.460@sdf.lonestar.org> <5915.2a9cafc9@hayes.com>
- Date: Sat, 29 Aug 1992 12:51:32 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- Toby Nixon replied:
- >Mohit Goyal sez:
- >
- >> Is it true Class 2 is not finalized and the current Class 2 modems use
- >> a Aug, 1991 spec. that is very different from the current spec?
- >
- >You're right that Class 2 is not yet finalized. TIA TR-29 just a
- >couple of weeks ago agreed to send it out for a final, 30-day letter
- >ballot, after which it will be either adopted as TIA-592 or (I
- >predict) abandoned if it doesn't pass. The modems on the market
- ^^^^^^^^^
- How does this impact the final ratification of a standard? Being
- somewhat pessimistic, this sounds like a setback.
-
- Thanks.
- --
- Jerry Wallace TechNIX, Inc.
- Electronic: jfw@technix.mn.org 103 Healy Building
- Acoustic: Installing 2301 Como Avenue
- Ballistic: Hah! Saint Paul, MN 55108
-