home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #19 / NN_1992_19.iso / spool / bit / listserv / sasl / 4037 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-09-03  |  5.1 KB  |  116 lines

  1. Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!auvm!LEICESTER.AC.UK!MAIL_SYSTEM
  3. Via: uk.ac.leicester; Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:08:18 +0100
  4. Message-ID: <SAS-L%92090311101450@VTVM2.BITNET>
  5. Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
  6. Date:         Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:00 BST
  7. Reply-To:     Mail_System@LEICESTER.AC.UK
  8. Sender:       "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@UGA.BITNET>
  9. From:         Mail_System@LEICESTER.AC.UK
  10. Subject:      %% Undelivered Mail %%
  11. Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
  12. Lines: 102
  13.  
  14. Your mail was not delivered as follows:
  15. %MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'
  16.  
  17. Your original mail header and message follow.
  18.  
  19. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  20. Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:07 BST
  21. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
  22.           id <sg.25433-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
  23.           Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:07:11 +0100
  24. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
  25.           id 9529; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:06:05 EDT
  26. Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
  27.           with BSMTP id 1324; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:05:45 EDT
  28. Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:03:00 BST
  29. Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
  30. Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  31. From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
  32. Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
  33. Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
  34. To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  35. Sender: SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2
  36.  
  37. Your mail was not delivered as follows:
  38. %MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'
  39.  
  40. Your original mail header and message follow.
  41.  
  42. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  43. Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  16:03 BST
  44. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
  45.           id <sg.25151-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
  46.           Thu, 3 Sep 1992 16:02:30 +0100
  47. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
  48.           id 9479; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:01:32 EDT
  49. Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
  50.           with BSMTP id 0933; Thu, 03 Sep 92 11:01:13 EDT
  51. Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:16:00 BST
  52. Reply-To: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
  53. Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  54. From: Mail_System@UK.AC.LEICESTER
  55. Subject: %% Undelivered Mail %%
  56. Comments: To: SAS-L <SAS-L@VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU>
  57. To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  58. Sender: SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2
  59.  
  60. Your mail was not delivered as follows:
  61. %MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UK.AC.LEICESTER.IRIX'
  62.  
  63. Your original mail header and message follow.
  64.  
  65. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  66. Via: UK.AC.NSFNET-RELAY; Thu, 3 Sep 92  15:16 BST
  67. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk with Internet SMTP
  68.           id <sg.22375-0@sun3.nsfnet-relay.ac.uk>;
  69.           Thu, 3 Sep 1992 15:15:56 +0100
  70. Received: from vtvm2.cc.vt.edu by VTVM2.CC.VT.EDU (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP
  71.           id 9208; Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:14:23 EDT
  72. Received: from VTVM2.BITNET by vtvm2.cc.vt.edu (Mailer R2.08 R208002)
  73.           with BSMTP id 9135; Thu, 03 Sep 92 10:14:11 EDT
  74. Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1992 10:13:25 -0400
  75. Reply-To: "Harlene C. Gogan: RTI's PC-SAS Technical Consultant"
  76.  <RTIHCG%BITNET.RTI@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  77. Original-Sender: "SAS(r) Discussion" <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  78. From: "Harlene C. Gogan: RTI's PC-SAS Technical Consultant"
  79.  <RTIHCG%BITNET.RTI@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  80. Subject: Observations, does it exist on-line?
  81. To: Multiple recipients of list SAS-L <SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2>
  82. Sender: SAS-L@EDU.VT.CC.VTVM2
  83.  
  84. ___________________________________________________________________________
  85. CONTENT:   Question (forwarded)
  86. SUMMARY:   Is Observations on-line anywhere?
  87. REL/PLTF:  All
  88. E-MAIL:    RTIHCG@RTI.BITNET
  89. NAME:      Harlene C. Gogan
  90. PH/ADDR:   (919) 541-6565 / RTI, PO12194, RTP,NC 27709
  91. DATE:      9/3/1992 10:15 EST
  92. __________________________________________________________________________
  93.  
  94. A message to me: Date: Wed, 2 Sep 92 14:54:19 PDT
  95. from: cconell@reed.edu (Carol Conell)
  96.  
  97. >Hi--Do you know if there's an online version of Observations or a reasonably
  98. >priced way of getting a specific article.  For those of us who merely
  99. >use SAS and work in small colleges, getting Observations means going
  100. >through interlibrary loan which would mean according to our library
  101. >forking over 6$ for the article + .25/page which is more than I can
  102. >afford personally.  Your discussion of the sas transport article made
  103. >it sound great, but it seems inaccessible.  Carol Conell
  104.  
  105. While I personally know of nowhere to observe Observations on-line, do
  106. any of the "SAS-L-ites" know any more?
  107.  
  108. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  109. End of returned mail
  110.  
  111. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  112. End of returned mail
  113.  
  114. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
  115. End of returned mail
  116.