home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!glia!tamara
- From: tamara@glia.biostr.washington.edu (tiny t)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.sas-l
- Subject: Re: Syntax-Sensitive Editing for SAS Programming (fwd)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug28.183124.6997@u.washington.edu>
- Date: 28 Aug 92 18:31:24 GMT
- References: <9208261628.AA02286@wubios>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Dept Biological Structure-University of Washington
- Lines: 12
-
- In response to Phil Miller's flame re: batch vs. interactive
- processing.
-
- sh folks. Everyone is really steaming lately. Is it the hurricane.
-
- B
- I was not in anyway advocating that one use interactive SAS
- instead of Batch, Phil. I was only answering a question about
- editors. I was trying to explain that one can use emacs in
- batch actually.
-
- I was trying to suggest that there might be another option.
-