home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!swrinde!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!CGEUGE51.BITNET!MERAT
- From: MERAT@CGEUGE51.BITNET (Roger Merat)
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.jnet-l
- Subject: Re: problem with jan_receive area and quotas
- Message-ID: <01GO9LDXH7TS000ZFI@uni2a.unige.ch>
- Date: 1 Sep 92 08:09:53 GMT
- Sender: BITNIC JNET-L List <JNET-L@UGA.BITNET>
- Lines: 9
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- X-Envelope-to: JNET-L@FINHUTC.BITNET
- X-VMS-To: IN%"JNET-L@FINHUTC.BITNET"
-
- If the SEND-to-self quota loophole is a problem, I think the most effective
- counter-measure against this abuse is to protect SENDFILE.EXE with an ACL
- such as (IDENTIFIER=NOSENDFILE,ACCESS=NONE) rather than deleting files in
- the JAN_RECEIVE area. That's crude, but as the abusers understand the rules
- very quickly, you don't have to grant the id NOSENDFILE frequently.
-
- Roger Merat merat@uni2a.unige.ch
- University of Geneva merat@cgeuge51.bitnet
- Switzerland c=ch/admd=arcom/prmd=switch/o=unige/ou=uni2a/s=merat
-