home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!stl!bnrgate!nrcnet0!cunews!torn!cs.utexas.edu!usc!rpi!batcomputer!munnari.oz.au!manuel!coombs!avalon
- From: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au (Darren Reed)
- Newsgroups: alt.irc
- Subject: Re: I REQUEST RESPONSES TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTION...
- Keywords: answers answers answers
- Message-ID: <avalon.715160593@coombs>
- Date: 30 Aug 92 07:43:13 GMT
- References: <BtrD2q.1sz@cs.dal.ca> <1992Aug29.233043.12716@rat.csc.calpoly.edu>
- Sender: news@newshost.anu.edu.au
- Organization: Computer Services Centre, Australian National University
- Lines: 15
-
- asamonte@polyslo.csc.calpoly.edu (Just some loser...) writes:
-
- [...]
- >First I would like to mention...that's three questions. But, actually
- >I don't think irc is too accessable. There is 2 or 3 limiting factors.
- >First, the person has to have access to a modem and the net. The majority
- >of people in the world don't have that. Second, they have to know about irc
- >before hand. It's not something you can really 'stumble' upon. Third
- >You have to be able to get to it. Usually that irc is installed on their
- >site (though people can use telnet clients, that's why it was or 3)
-
- You dont need a modem and you can stumble across it - I did :)
-
- avalon
-