home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- X-Gateway-Source-Info: INTERNET
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ucselx!network.ucsd.edu!mvb.saic.com!tgv.com!info-multinet
- Date: 22 AUG 92 19:38:36 GMT
- Newsgroups: vmsnet.networks.tcp-ip.multinet
- X-Return-path: <info-multinet-relay@TGV.COM>
- X-RFC822-From: JFISHER@ISDRES.ER.USGS.GOV (James R. Fisher 703-648-7026)
- From: JFISHER@ISDRES.ER.USGS.GOV
- Subject: Postmasters and privacy
- X-Vmsmail-To: inet%"info-multinet@tgv.com"
- Organization: The INFO-MULTINET Community
- Message-ID: <202017E222AUG92193836@TGV.COM>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: Mvb.Saic.Com
- Lines: 25
-
- I don't know that this subject properly belongs on the Multinet
- list, but I'll try anyway. I am postmaster on my host (and by
- default on the whole of usgs.gov). Two questions about what a
- postmaster can/should do with regard to privacy issues:
-
- 1) In a government installation like mine, there is a strict
- rule that machines are to be used for government business only.
- This is likely codified in federal law, but I know not where.
- Similar restrictions likely also apply to commercial establishments.
- In such an environment, if a postmaster accidentally/deliberately
- reads the body of a mail message, could s/he properly be accused
- of invading 'personal privacy' ? (Who's sleeping with whom does
- not seem to be included in the category of government business,
- current political campaigns aside).
-
- 2) On more than one occasion, _I_ have seen on this machine pieces
- of mail which could neither be sent to the destination nor returned
- to the sender. On investigation, the sender used some sort of word
- processing package to construct the body, so there were lines as
- long as 3000 characters. So I took the offending text into an editor
- and placed hard carriage returns in the proper places, so as to
- make the mail sendable. Did I invade the personal privacy of the
- sender/receiver in so doing ?
-
- -jrf
-