home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.philosophy.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!mips!sdd.hp.com!usc!aero.org!foy
- From: foy@aero.org (Richard Foy)
- Subject: Re: Assasination
- Message-ID: <1992Aug20.155458.22813@aero.org>
- Sender: news@aero.org
- Organization: The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA
- References: <1992Aug19.181238.14909@husc3.harvard.edu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 1992 15:54:58 GMT
- Lines: 18
-
- In article <1992Aug19.181238.14909@husc3.harvard.edu> zeleny@husc9.harvard.edu (Michael Zeleny) writes:
- >In a recent discussion I noted the legitimacy of assasination as the last
- >recourse for obtaining justice, as witnessed by the German and French court
- >decisions in the cases of Tehlirian's 1921 killing of Talaat Bey and
- >Schwartsbard's 1927 killing of Petliura. It is my considered opinion that
- >such a course of action may be morally justified, *provided that* no other
- >
- >cordially,
- >mikhail zeleny@husc.harvard.edu
-
-
- My suggestion would be somewhat different. I suggest that the person that
- one considers worthy of assasination should be tried in absentia before the
- World Court. If convicted of a capital crime an adaquet reward could be
- offered for his capture dead or alive.
-
- Richard Foy Standard Disclaimer
-
-