home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!The-Village!waterbed
- From: Larry Margolis <margoli@watson.ibm.com>
- Subject: Re: Dodge _THIS_...
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Aug16.033712.19358@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 03:37:12 GMT
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- Nntp-Posting-Host: netslip63.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: The Village Waterbed
- Lines: 28
-
- In <1992Aug15.205407.9744@csus.edu> chaneysa@nextnet.csus.edu (Stephen A Chaney) writes:
- > In article <1992Aug13.005840.139822@cs.cmu.edu> kck+@cs.cmu.edu (Karl Kluge) wri
- >
- > >A -- Minors are entitled to exercise the right of privacy at the same level
- > >as adults.
- > >
- > >B. -- Minors are competent to give consent to sex with an adult.
- > >
- > >C. -- Minors are competent to give consent to an abortion without parental
- > >consent.
- >
- > B and C are dependent on A.
-
- (In Florida; according to Judge Lockett)
-
- Your previous claim was that being in favor of B mean being in favor
- of C, which is clearly not correct. I'm glad to see that you've backed
- off from this.
-
- > >Which means that your statement above "According to Judge Lockett, to have
- > >abortion rights, you must invalidate statutory rape laws" is incorrect.
- >
- > No, my statement is,
-
- You mean your *new* statement, now that it's finally been made clear to
- you that your previous statement (which Mr. Kluge quoted) is incorrect.
-
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-