home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / sci / skeptic / 14717 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-20  |  1.3 KB
  1. Xref: sparky sci.skeptic:14717 talk.origins:9790
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!pacbell.com!charon.amdahl.com!amdahl!jloucks
  3. From: jloucks@uts.amdahl.com (Jim Loucks)
  4. Newsgroups: sci.skeptic,talk.origins
  5. Subject: Re: Young earth creationist logic NOT!
  6. Message-ID: <f21n03GT656G00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com>
  7. Date: 20 Aug 92 17:41:53 GMT
  8. References: <1992Aug17.141019@IASTATE.EDU> <39EA03P761SV00@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <74uq03T562o200@amdahl.uts.amdahl.com> <1992Aug19.193950.100325@zeus.calpoly.edu>
  9. Organization: Amdahl Corporation, Sunnyvale CA
  10. Lines: 19
  11.  
  12. skroger@zeus.calpoly.edu (Seth L. Kroger) writes:
  13. >jloucks@uts.amdahl.com (Jim Loucks) writes:
  14. >>kv07@IASTATE.EDU (Warren Vonroeschlaub) writes:
  15.  
  16. >>> If God's intention was to confuse us wouldn't he have
  17. >>>made the tree rings, ice cores, lake bottoms, and coral reefs all disagree to
  18. >>>some extent as a hint?
  19.  
  20. >>His intention was not to confuse us.
  21.  
  22. >If he didn't intend to confuse us, then why did he do this?  Mr. Omnicience
  23. >surely would have known what what such things would have been taken for.
  24.  
  25. Who says he *did* confuse us, I'm sure not confused. Maybe it's the
  26. interpretation of the data that's confusing you?
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29. Jim Loucks           jloucks@uts.amdahl.com 
  30. {apple, pyramid, sun, uunet}!amdahl!jloucks
  31.