home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa3.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa3.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: How to make big bucks using supersymmetry
- Date: 20 Aug 92 19:42:04 GMT
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 20
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <25625@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- References: <13AUG199218325029@zeus.tamu.edu> <1992Aug14.164822.10838@utagraph.uta.edu> <MATT.92Aug19225852@physics16.berkeley.edu>
- Reply-To: sichase@csa3.lbl.gov
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
-
- In article <MATT.92Aug19225852@physics16.berkeley.edu>, matt@physics16.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) writes...
- >It also isn't at all easy to drive a stake through the heart of the
- >MSSM; all any experiment can do is to exclude some region in this
- >multi-dimensional parameter space, and there will always be some
- >allowed region left.
-
- For a while, people were talking about a definitive test by searching for the
- lightest MSSM neutral higgs. The mass was supposed to be constrained to be
- less than the Z mass, if I remember correctly. Unfortunately, someone bothered
- to calculate the radiative corrections, and the whole plan was ruined. Do
- you know if there is still an upper bound on the mass - or do the
- corrections leave things wide open?
-
- -Scott
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "The question seems to be of such a character
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV that if I should come to life after my death
- and some mathematician were to tell me that it
- had been definitely settled, I think I would
- immediately drop dead again." - Vandiver
-