home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!slc3.ins.cwru.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!csa3.lbl.gov!sichase
- From: sichase@csa3.lbl.gov (SCOTT I CHASE)
- Newsgroups: sci.physics
- Subject: Re: Physics News Update #92 (8/19)
- Date: 20 Aug 92 19:36:11 GMT
- Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory - Berkeley, CA, USA
- Lines: 32
- Distribution: usa
- Message-ID: <25624@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
- References: <1992Aug19.205526.13923@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Reply-To: sichase@csa3.lbl.gov
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.3.254.198
- Summary: Second posting of PNUP to sci.physics
- Keywords: physics news interesting cherry
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
-
- >THE ELECTRICAL CHARGE OF ANTIPROTONS AND POSITRONS has been studied
- >using data from cyclotron- frequency experiments (which monitor the
- >behavior of particles in a magnetic field) comparing protons with
- >antiprotons and electrons with positrons, as well as spectroscopic
- >measurements of short- lived states containing antimatter, such as
- >positronium and antiprotonic atoms. Richard Hughes of Los Alamos and
- >B.I. Deutch of the University of Aarhus in Denmark have calculated
- >that the charges of the positron and electron are equal to about one
- >part in 10**8, while the charge of the antiproton equals that of the
- >electron to about one part in 10**5 (Phys. Rev. Lett., 27 July). The
- >precision of these calculations would improve if researchers could
- >study antihydrogen, an atom consisting entirely of antimatter.
- >(Science News, 15 August 1992.)
-
- Of course, the author *meant* to say that they showed that the charges
- were equal to *better* than a part in 10**8, etc. No differences were found.
- I might add that it is known that the charge of the electron and proton
- are known to be identical to better than a part in 10^27 (though 10^24 might be
- the highest published value.) That's how I got started in experimental
- physics - as an undergrad at MIT I worked for about a year with John
- King, who did this original work, on an improvement of a few more orders
- of magnitude. The experiment went on after I left, and I don't even
- know whether results were ever published, but it convinced me that
- physics is the thing to do (as if I had any doubts before that.)
-
- -Scott
- --------------------
- Scott I. Chase "The question seems to be of such a character
- SICHASE@CSA2.LBL.GOV that if I should come to life after my death
- and some mathematician were to tell me that it
- had been definitely settled, I think I would
- immediately drop dead again." - Vandiver
-