home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!cix.compulink.co.uk!dingbat
- Newsgroups: rec.autos.tech
- From: dingbat@cix.compulink.co.uk (Codesmiths)
- Subject: Re: Anti-theft immobilisers
- Cc: dingbat@cix.compulink.co.uk
- Reply-To: dingbat@cix.compulink.co.uk
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 1992 22:33:47 +0000
- Message-ID: <memo.577960@cix.compulink.co.uk>
- Sender: usenet@gate.demon.co.uk
- Lines: 15
-
- In-Reply-To: gss@btcase.bt.co.uk (Graham Sewell)
-
- > >Anyone have any comments on these things ? Reliability, cost,
- > >quality of fitting work, ease of bypassing them, etc.
- > >I'm particularly interested in UK makes, like VECTA & Foxguard.
- >
- > I have experience of two alarm systems in the UK, Sonic and AutoBlock.
-
- No !
-
- VECTA is an immobiliser, it *isn't* an alarm. I'm specifically
- looking for comments on dedicated immobilisers, and particularly the
- VECTA.
-
- Andy Dingley dingbat@cix.compulink.co.uk
-