home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!osyjm
- From: osyjm@cs.montana.edu (Jaye Mathisen)
- Subject: Re: DECnsr, has anyone any experience with it?
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.230335.18928@coe.montana.edu>
- Sender: usenet@coe.montana.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: CS
- References: <JOHN.92Aug18105157@sekrit.WPI.EDU> <1992Aug19.224712.27925@coe.montana.edu> <1992Aug21.143203.26200@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 23:03:35 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1992Aug21.143203.26200@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> giltner@pogo.Colorado.EDU (Jon Giltner) writes:
- >
- >DECnsr is *not* a DEC-developed product. It is simply Legato's Networker
- >marketed thru DEC. I don't know how much actual development DEC is
- >putting into it, but I am told that DECnsr componants and Networker
- >componants interact. This explains why Sun RPC instead of DCE and why
- >it's not under CSLG.
-
- I stand corrected. I did a quick "strings" on the binary, but missed
- the "Legato Systems" stuff. My mistake. I assumed it was a complete
- dec developed product, based on something I read here earlier.
-
- So, disregard my comments on the RPC stuff, and the HP 700 stuff, as they're
- no longer applicable.
-
- Even so, I till probably won't buy it though. I really need to be able to do
- HP9000/700's in any long-term solution I choose. So unless 2.0 supports it,
- NSR is still out.
-
-
- NSR is conceptually a great product. The implementation lacks.
- --
- Jaye Mathisen, COE Systems Manager (406) 994-4780
- 410 Roberts Hall,Dept. of Computer Science
- Montana State University,Bozeman MT 59717 osyjm@cs.montana.edu
-