home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!ames!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!fdurt1.fdu.edu!wisdom.bubble.org!sugra!ken
- From: ken@sugra.uucp (Kenneth Ng)
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
- Subject: Re: FAS 2.10 async driver, part 5/5
- Message-ID: <1992Aug22.131428.3628@sugra.uucp>
- Date: 22 Aug 92 13:14:28 GMT
- References: <F5557UC@geminix.in-berlin.de: <102.26574@incc.com>
- Organization: Private Computer, Totowa NJ
- Lines: 19
-
- In article <102.26574@incc.com:, jerry@incc.com (Jerry Rocteur) writes:
- : In article <F5557UC@geminix.in-berlin.de>, gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de (Uwe Doering) writes:
- : > Submitted-by: gemini@geminix.in-berlin.de
- : > Archive-name: fas210/part05
- : Who is the irresponsible bastard who posts large files in a non source
- : newsgroup.
- : I have to pay for my news, plus I have to pay for the US-Europe phone
- : call and I am not impressed having to pay to get this crap.
-
- Since I also have to pay for news I can appreciate your dilema, but the FAS
- drivers are a major plus for a lot of 386 based Unix machines. I would
- say that 'irresponsible bastard' is way tooo harsh especially considering
- the extreme value of the product, the support from Uwe Doering, and the
- relative infrequency of his version updates.
-
- --
- Kenneth Ng
- Please reply to kdn5669@hertz.njit.edu for now.
- Apple and AT&T lawsuits: Just say NO!
-