home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
- Path: sparky!uunet!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!shanega
- From: shanega@athena.mit.edu (Shane G. Artis)
- Subject: Re: EquationBuilder - WriteNow - Create, questions, etc.
- Message-ID: <1992Aug21.142343.26292@athena.mit.edu>
- Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: e40-008-11.mit.edu
- Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology
- References: <1992Aug20.195523.4994@hamblin.math.byu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1992 14:23:43 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- In article <1992Aug20.195523.4994@hamblin.math.byu.edu> bill@mathnx.math.byu.edu (Bill Smith) writes:
- >A few questions for those of you who are using equation builder:
-
- I'd like to keep it simple: How (precisely) does EquationBuilder
- compare to TeX and LaTeX? In which areas does EquationBuilder match
- up or fall short in creating mathematical expressions (not counting
- EquationBuilder's lack of tables). As I would use EquationBuilder to
- replace TeX and LaTeX, this is an important point for me.
-
- Regards,
-
- Shane
-
-