home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!olivea!decwrl!bu.edu!jade.tufts.edu!news.tufts.edu!amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu!ppoh
- From: ppoh@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu (Paul B. Poh)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.software
- Subject: Re: WhichX?
- Message-ID: <PPOH.92Aug21094436@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu>
- Date: 21 Aug 92 13:49:43 GMT
- References: <1992Aug20.144448.15125@dvorak.amd.com> <171pv0INNfda@agate.berkeley.edu>
- <1992Aug21.053718.24992@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
- Sender: news@news.tufts.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Tufts University - Medford, MA
- Lines: 20
- In-Reply-To: ede978e@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au's message of 21 Aug 92 05:37:18 GMT
-
-
- In article <1992Aug21.053718.24992@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> ede978e@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (Robert D. Nicholson) writes:
- > Regardless whats out there in PD for X I would go commercial.
- >
- > For this reason, X on the NeXT is supported by volunteers who don't
- > gain commerically. Now given NS3.0 is about to be released you can
- > be sure that the commerial vendors have made sure that their products
- > are compatible with future OS releases.
- >
- > Just my thoughts on this matter.
-
- Personally, I'm going to make sure that my version of the X-server will
- work with NS3.0 :=) since I plan to install 3.0 when I get it. Speaking of
- X servers, I was wondering if anyone was working on a pd rootless X server.
- I had heard that there was some interest a few months ago.
-
- Paul.
- --
- Paul Poh Unix Systems Programmer
- ppoh@amethyst.tcs.tufts.edu Computer Services, Tufts University
-