home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #18 / NN_1992_18.iso / spool / comp / sys / next / misc / 18810 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-08-19  |  1006 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!mips!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tekig7!tekig6!danh
  2. From: danh@tekig6.PEN.TEK.COM (Dan Hartman)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
  4. Subject: Re: Anyone have opinions on NeXT 17" and 21" color monitors?
  5. Message-ID: <6619@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM>
  6. Date: 19 Aug 92 15:59:31 GMT
  7. References: <1992Aug17.031029.24849@tamsun.tamu.edu> <1992Aug18.113620.359@stc.nato.int> <Bt8K5x.7xC@well.sf.ca.us>
  8. Sender: news@tekig7.PEN.TEK.COM
  9. Organization: Tektronix, Inc., Beaverton,  OR.
  10. Lines: 14
  11.  
  12. The 1084 Monitor, isn't that a 640x200 non-interlaced monitor?
  13. I would say definitely not possible.
  14.  
  15. or is that commodore's multi-sync model - I think that goes up to 1280 x 200
  16. which still isn't enough in the vertical direction.
  17.  
  18. Then again, I may be wrong.... But I'm almost positive the 1084 is the cheapo-
  19. one, as the  1084S was a stereo speaker version.
  20.  
  21. Later,
  22.  
  23. Dan Hartman
  24. omv@athena.mit.edu
  25. danh@tekig6.pen.tek.com (active untill 8/20/92)
  26.