home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.next.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!paladin.american.edu!gatech!ukma!lexmark!songer
- From: songer@lexmark.com (Christopher Songer)
- Subject: Re: NeXTstep 3.0
- Message-ID: <1992Aug18.204351.178605@lexmark.com>
- X-Disclaimer: These views are the poster's and not necessarily those of Lexmark
- Sender: usenet@lexmark.com (News Dude)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: 9.51.7.57
- Organization: Lexington, KY
- References: <57135@mentor.cc.purdue.edu> <1992Aug18.165446.25866@cs.yale.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 20:43:51 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
- nathan@laplace.biology.yale.edu writes:
- >
- >Given the choice, I would have had NeXT make separate
- >(later) releases of the new packages (dbkit, 3D stuff,
- >etc) and just work on getting the stable base release out
- >on time.
- >
-
- I'd have to agree with this. My current assumption is that 3.0 is likely
- to be pretty unstable -- I think I'm going to wait for 3.1. If this does
- in fact come to pass (I'd like to be wrong) then Next seems to be making
- a habit of this. (I'm sure everyone recalls how stable 2.0 was :) Next
- has great software, but the base has to be stable for it to be usable.
-
- Anyway,
- -Chris
-
-