home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.os.os2.programmer:4203 comp.os.os2.advocacy:3897
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!rutgers!njitgw.njit.edu!hertz.njit.edu!dic5340
- From: dic5340@hertz.njit.edu (David Charlap)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy
- Subject: Re: A question or three.
- Message-ID: <1992Aug13.173409.25915@njitgw.njit.edu>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 17:34:09 GMT
- References: <1992Aug10.162757.13720@thyme.jpl.nasa.gov> <1992Aug11.222749.29690@panix.com>
- Sender: news@njit.edu
- Distribution: na
- Organization: New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, N.J.
- Lines: 18
- Nntp-Posting-Host: hertz.njit.edu
-
- In article <1992Aug11.222749.29690@panix.com> os2man@panix.com (Larry Salomon Jr.) writes:
- >>By contrast, when I examined the M's*ft Windows 3.0 SDK, my impression was
- >>that programming Windows was akin to programming X at the Xlib level,
- >>leading me to believe that programming for PM may be more like programming
- >>in Xt with a Widget set. Would anyone care to confirm or deny that
- >>assessment?
- >
- >It is my opinion (implies disclaimer) that Windows and PM programming are
- >very similar.
-
- They have similar concepts, but the MS API makes you do more work.
- You have to call functions that, IMO, should be called automatically
- when the program loads.
- --
- |) David Charlap "I don't even represent myself
- /|_ dic5340@hertz.njit.edu sometimes so NJIT is right out!.
- ((|,)
- ~|~ Hi! I am a .signature virus, copy me into your .signature file.
-