home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!mips!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!batcomputer!cornell!rochester!galileo.cc.rochester.edu!ub!acsu.buffalo.edu!tjc
- From: tjc@acsu.buffalo.edu (Thomas J. Corsalini)
- Newsgroups: comp.os.os2.misc
- Subject: 14.4k modems
- Summary: modem UART
- Message-ID: <Bt8y6w.1o5@acsu.buffalo.edu>
- Date: 19 Aug 92 19:59:19 GMT
- Sender: nntp@acsu.buffalo.edu
- Organization: UB Law School
- Lines: 34
- Nntp-Posting-Host: autarch.acsu.buffalo.edu
-
-
- I am going to purchase a new modem and would appreciate feedback on
- the following points.
-
- a) I was going to purchase a v.32 modem but it would appear that the
- 14.4k models, many with FAX included, are not that much more. I have
- seen ads that range from $250 - $500+. I don't have an immediate
- need for a FAX but...why upgrade again soon. Anyone have experience
- with any of the less expensive brands/models?
-
- b) I do not currently have an I/O card with a 16550 UART. If I am
- working predominantly working under OS/2 can I safely assume that I
- do NOT actually need the FIFO buffer of the 16550? Does OS/2
- suffiently buffer the com port? Would the modem suffer a performance
- degradation under DOS?
-
- c) It seems that only the internal models have a 16550 integrated
- into their design. Can someone explain the logic of this.
-
- d) Finally, without starting a flame war, would anyone care to
- voice an opinon on a particular brand? I have seen good prices
- for the Supra 14.4, HST Sportster, and Practical Periphials - in
- accending order ;>) spelled CO$T.
-
- It is my intent to avoid a costly mistake by soliciting your help
- be it by experience or opinion. Thank you to all that reply...Tom
-
-
-
- --
- + T.J.Corsalini, Director - Computing Services @ UB Law School +
- + State University of New York at Buffalo +
- + Internet: mictom@ubvms.cc.buffalo.edu +
- + Voice: (716)636-5959 Fax: (716)636-2064 +
-