home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.misc
- Path: sparky!uunet!ulowell!swlvx2!swlrau.msd.ray.com!rgc
- From: rgc@swlrau.msd.ray.com (RICK CARLE)
- Subject: Re: Let's start a DR-DOS newsgroup- All in favor- say aye!
- Message-ID: <1992Aug19.132315.7528@swlvx2.msd.ray.com>
- Sender: news@swlvx2.msd.ray.com (NEWS USER)
- Organization: Raytheon Company, Tewksbury, MA
- References: <1992Aug14.203339.7139@novell.com> <714100165snx@n5ial.chi.il.us>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1992 13:23:15 GMT
- Lines: 17
-
-
- jim@n5ial.chi.il.us (Jim Graham) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Aug14.203339.7139@novell.com> dougb@novell.com writes:
-
- >> Do you like the name: comp.os.drdos?
-
- >no. if anything, it should be part of the comp.os.msdos heirarchy,
- >IMHO, just like (and yes, I know that 4dos is not an operating system,
- >only a shell) comp.os.msdos.4dos.
-
- I like the .drdos idea, but I prefer comp.os.msdos.drdos.
- When comp.os.msdos.4dos appeared, I automatically picked it up, since I
- subscribe to comp.os.msdos.* I liked that.
- There don't seem to be enough drdos articles to justify .programmer.
- Rick
-
-