home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!darwin.sura.net!convex!news.utdallas.edu!corpgate!crchh327!davisonj
- From: davisonj@bnr.ca (John Davison)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
- Subject: Re: C versus FORTRAN debate
- Summary: ...or Ratfor
- Message-ID: <1992Aug18.194549.24658@bnr.ca>
- Date: 18 Aug 92 19:45:49 GMT
- References: <1992Aug15.172219.2138@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <92231.155237HBO043@DJUKFA11.BITNET> <py0mz+n@lynx.unm.edu>
- Sender: news@bnr.ca (News on crchh327)
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research, Richardson, Tx.
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: crchh7ab
-
- In article <py0mz+n@lynx.unm.edu> john@aquarius.unm.edu (John Prentice) writes:
- >If we are going to debate Fortran versus *any* other language, let's at
- >least debate the merits of Fortran 90 (or variants like HPF or Fortran D).
-
- ...or Ratfor... <--- that is a JOKE
-
-
- --
- NOTE: I CAN'T SEND/RECEIVE E-MAIL HERE!!! Use --> davisonj@ecn.purdue.edu <--
- During (roughly) August 20-25, I will be in transit. Please be patient.
- The opinions and other information contained herein are not necessarily
- representative of Northern Telecom or any of its subsidiaries.
-