home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!news.cs.indiana.edu!lynx!aquarius.unm.edu!john
- From: john@aquarius.unm.edu (John Prentice)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
- Subject: Re: C versus FORTRAN debate
- Message-ID: <py0mz+n@lynx.unm.edu>
- Date: 18 Aug 92 17:46:46 GMT
- References: <1992Aug14.224112.19348@sol.UVic.CA> <1992Aug15.172219.2138@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de> <92231.155237HBO043@DJUKFA11.BITNET>
- Organization: Dept. of Physics & Astro, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque
- Lines: 10
-
- If we are going to debate Fortran versus *any* other language, let's at
- least debate the merits of Fortran 90 (or variants like HPF or Fortran D).
- Continuing to compare F77 to languages like C is a bit silly.
-
- John
- --
- Dr. John K. Prentice
- Partner, Quetzal Computational Associates
- 3200 Carlisle N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87110-1664; 505-889-4543
- john@unmfys.unm.edu -or- jkprent@cs.sandia.gov -or- prentice@rufous.cs.unm.edu
-