home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!mucs!m1!bevan
- From: bevan@cs.man.ac.uk (Stephen J Bevan)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.forth
- Subject: Re: Free Forth
- Message-ID: <BEVAN.92Aug13105945@jaguar.cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: 13 Aug 92 09:59:45 GMT
- References: <3958.UUL1.3#5129@willett.pgh.pa.us> <BEVAN.92Aug6173810@otter.cs.man.ac.uk>
- <BEVAN.92Aug8212328@jaguar.cs.man.ac.uk> <5508@transfer.stratus.com>
- <1992Aug12.215854.19195@crd.ge.com>
- Sender: news@cs.man.ac.uk
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Manchester
- Lines: 22
- In-reply-to: eaker@ukulele.crd.ge.com's message of 12 Aug 92 21:58:54 GMT
-
- In article <1992Aug12.215854.19195@crd.ge.com> eaker@ukulele.crd.ge.com (Chuck Eaker) writes:
-
- I agree that free or cheap opens the markets of hobbyists,
- students, and many schools, but it's irrelevant to businesses.
-
- I don't see how it can be irrelevant. When I went to work for a
- FORTRAN only shop, I introduced them to C as an alternative for the
- more system oriented programs they were writing (they were mainly
- doing scientific/numerical work). This wouldn't have happened if I
- hadn't picked up C using a _free_ compiler while I was at university.
- I don't see why the same thing couldn't happen with FORTH. As it
- happens they also had a couple of control/instrumentation projects
- with PCs. The project language was BASIC ! IMHO FORTH would have
- been much better, but I couldn't sell them on it as there wasn't a
- standard (even a defacto one like PC BASIC) that they could use. Sure
- they could have bought into a particular vendor's products, but they
- wanted portability and the freedom to mix and match vendors products
- as necessary. Note the slight hypocrisy here as they were tied to
- Microsoft BASIC, but to bastardise an old saying, "no one every got
- fired for buying Microsoft" :-)
-
- bevan
-