home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!news.claremont.edu!ucivax!gateway
- From: kling@ics.uci.edu (Rob Kling)
- Subject: Article - Behind the Terminal
- Message-ID: <9208131722.aa25629@q2.ics.uci.edu>
- Newsgroups: comp.groupware
- Lines: 81
- Date: 14 Aug 92 00:22:06 GMT
-
-
- This is the abstract of an article which you might find of interest.
- It examines the social dimesnions of implementing information systems
- and office systems with ideas that are pertinent to groupware. But it
- does not specialize in groupware issues. Consequently, I'm not
- posting the full article on comp.groupware. I have posted the full
- article on comp.society and comp.infosystems.
-
- I will soon be giving some seminars on the web models whihc are partially
- explained in this paper. Consequently, I'd appreciate any feedback.
-
- If there is interest, I'll post an earlier, companion paper,
- "Defining the Boundaries of Computing Across Complex
- Organizations" in Critical Issues in Information Systems
- Research. Richard Boland and Rudolf Hirschheim (eds.) John Wiley
- and Sons, 1987.
-
- Best wishes,
-
- Rob Kling
-
- ===========================================
- Behind the Terminal:
- The Critical Role of Computing Infrastructure
- In Effective Information Systems' Development and Use
-
-
- Rob Kling
- Department of Information and Computer Science
- Public Policy Research Organization
- University of California
- Irvine, Ca 92717
- 714-856-5955
- email:kling@ics.uci.edu
-
- Draft 4.02
- July 17, 1991 (Aug 4, 1991)
-
- To appear in: Challenges and Strategies for Research in Systems
- Development. William Cotterman and James Senn (Ed.). John Wiley,
- London.
-
- ABSTRACT
- Contemporary approaches to systems analysis ignore the importance
- of computing infrastructure -- the kinds of resources necessary
- for making computerized system workable and effective.
- Infrastructure includes "hard resources" such as electricity and
- physical space; it also includes human resources such as the
- skill levels of systems users and maintainer.
- Systems analyses which account for infrastructure can help lead
- to more effective recommendations. The key organizing ideas of
- this paper, web models, are based on almost 20 years of empirical
- studies of the ways that people and organizations adopt, develop
- and use computerized systems. It is based on an understanding of
- how people and organizations actually behave rather than upon a
- model which prescribes how they should behave.
-
- Web models draw "large" social boundaries around a focal
- computing resource so that the defining situation includes: the
- ecology of participants who influence the adoption and use of
- computer-based technologies, the infrastructures for supporting
- system development and use, and the history of local computing
- developments. Web models help explain the actual leverage of
- computing developments, their carrying costs, and the ways that
- systems are valued by different participants. Web models are
- contrasted with conventionally rational "discrete-entity" models
- which are a-contextual, a-historical, and assume that adequate
- infrastructure can always be available as needed.
- The web approach to computing infrastructure is illustrated with
- a rich longitudinal case study of the use of desktop computing in
- a dynamic work group. The chapter also examines ways that
- infrastructure designs influence the choice of computerized
- systems which are appropriate for specific groups of users.
-
- Acknowledgements: I've deepened my understanding of computing
- infrastructure and systems development in discussions with Jon
- Allen, Werner Beuschel, Joey George, Suzanne Iacono, Tom Jewett,
- Matthew Jones, Kate Kaiser, John King, Kenneth Kraemer, Steve
- Lepore, Geoff Walsham, and Mary Zmuidzinas. Funds for conducting
- some of the research reported here came from NSF Grants
- IRI8709613 and IRI9015497.
-