home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!uknet!acorn!steve
- From: steve@acorn.co.uk (Steve "daffy" Hunt)
- Newsgroups: uk.transport
- Subject: Re: Bus vs Car Costs (Was: Re: City Traffic)
- Message-ID: <21168@acorn.co.uk>
- Date: 23 Jan 93 18:45:21 GMT
- References: <1993Jan22.150050.8972@lut.ac.uk>
- Organization: Acorn Computers Limited, Cambridge, UK
- Lines: 29
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL8]
-
- : Trouble is of course that once you've got a car it is the marginal cost
- : that matters. I'm in favour of public transport, but I don't intend to
- : give up my car.
-
- Yes. The problem is that while public transport is good for some
- kinds of journey, most people find they need private transport for
- other journeys that the public system can't satisfy (night travel,
- whatever). So they own a car. Now, the standing cost of car
- ownership is very high, so they have to use it for most of their
- journeys, even ones that *could* be made with public transport, to
- save money on the marginal cost.
-
- This is why the public transport system needs to be *very* good, and
- meet the three criteria I posted before, to persuade people that they
- can do without cars altogether. (Yes, I know some posters on here are
- able to do without private transport; all I can say is you must live
- very different lives than I do).
-
- : One way of evening things up is to try to decrease the fixed cost of
- : having a car and increase the marginal cost. The most obvious way of
- : doing this is to reduce or abolish road tax and increase the tax (duty?)
- : on fuel to compensate. Can anyone think of anything else that can be
- : done on these lines?
-
- Legislation to keep the insurance companies in line? This year mine
- tried to increase my premium by 56% after a (yet another) claim-free
- year. Needless to say I switched firms.
- --
- Steve Hunt steve@acorn.co.uk
-