home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!news
- From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk>
- Newsgroups: uk.transport
- Subject: Re: City Traffic
- Message-ID: <930122.165530.6d7.rusnews.w165w@mantis.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 16:55:30 GMT
- References: <935820125829@ibm3090.bham.ac.uk> <21132@acorn.co.uk>
- Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
- X-Newsreader: rusnews v0.98
- Lines: 44
-
- steve@acorn.co.uk (Steve "daffy" Hunt) writes:
- > I think they have it the wrong way round. They should improve public
- > transport until it is really convenient, and then the car problem will
- > automatically reduce.
-
- I think this is not entirely true. Once you pay the enormous cost of car,
- insurance and so on, every journey you can use it for reduces the *apparent*
- cost of the car.
-
- For instance, if your car + insurance cost is #1000 per year and you only
- plan to make one journey by car, it's a ridiculous proposition. If you can
- find a thousand journeys to make, however, the cost is a more reasonable #1 +
- petrol. Hence there is pressure to find journeys to make, in order to
- justify the cost of the car.
-
- Putting it another way, once you have a car, you tend to use it even when
- such use is unnecessary or inappropriate. For example, I yelled at my mother
- for getting the car out in order to drive three hundred metres down the road
- to the village shop.
-
- These days she walks, and now realises how ridiculous her behaviour was. But
- she hadn't previously even thought about the situation; it was a case of "I
- am going somewhere, therefore I will get the car out". The fact that many
- other people living in the same village are demanding car parking spaces
- outside the village hall indicates that the "car for all journeys" mindset is
- fairly widespread.
-
- Another factor is that people tend to ignore the time taken to find parking
- when they calculate their journey time by car. You may have to wait ten
- minutes to get a bus into Cambridge from Chesterton, but you can easily spend
- twenty minutes queueing for a parking space on Saturdays.
-
- > I never hear it mooted in transport debates, but it makes an awful lot
- > of sense: get rid of the rush hour. Because 9 to 5 working is so
- > strongly ingrained in our culture, it would be necessary to introduce
- > legislation, or positive financial incentives, to encourage companies
- > to operate staggered hours or flexitime.
-
- If we're doing away with 9-to-5 and letting people go to work at different
- times of the day, let's get rid of British Summer Time while we're at it.
- I've never worked 9 to 5 anyway.
-
-
- mathew
-