home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!pipex!edcastle!warwick!uknet!fulcrum!graeme
- From: graeme@fulcrum.co.uk (Graeme Hodgson)
- Newsgroups: uk.telecom
- Subject: Re: Caller ID
- Message-ID: <C179BI.np@fulcrum.co.uk>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 10:33:18 GMT
- References: <6531@mccuts.uts.mcc.ac.uk> <1993Jan21.094646.21169@jet.uk>
- Sender: news@fulcrum.co.uk
- Distribution: uk
- Organization: Fulcrum Communications
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1993Jan21.094646.21169@jet.uk> tp@jet.uk (Tarang K Patel) writes:
- > Have you ever wondered with all the hype about system X and/ or Y what has
- > really changed for the private Telephone user since say the 70's ---
- >
- > "Not an iota .... "
- >
- > Stuff the B in T and let NTT, AT&T ad Pacific bell etc... come in and show
- > B.T and Mercury how its done. :-)
-
- Why do people always assume that because the telco can provide some
- really interesting feature that 0.6% of the population find really
- useful it is inherently a better operator?
-
- I suggest all those that believe the American networks to be better
- than the UK read an article posted last week in comp.dcom.telecom on
- how a University of California survey found the American operators to
- be lagging behind, in particular, Japan, Singapore and the UK.
-
- As for NTT, I expect they're pretty good.
-
- Graeme (defender of the operators of possibly the) Hodgson.
- (world's best telecommunications networks )
-
- --
- Hodj ~ ~
- Email to graeme@fulcrum.co.uk | "Well I still prefer woble O O
- - whenever the mood takes you. | and eenk" - Dave Budd *
- The opinions expressed above are all my own work, honest. \_/
-