home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.physics.fusion
- Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!darwin.sura.net!sgiblab!nec-gw!netkeeper!vivaldi!aslws01!aslss01!terry
- From: terry@asl.dl.nec.com
- Subject: Re: Implications of hypothesis of subground states
- Message-ID: <1993Jan25.061714.16368@asl.dl.nec.com>
- Originator: terry@aslss01
- Sender: news@asl.dl.nec.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: aslss01
- Organization: (Speaking only for myself)
- References: <1993Jan21.192756.23373@ns.network.com> <1993Jan22.203403.1148@asl.dl.nec.com> <1993Jan24.085220.17739@coplex.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 06:17:14 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- Sorry, folks, but I'm not interested in having anything to do with another
- Mills et al phase in this group. See you all later (maybe _reeeaaal_ later).
- Email me directly if you have something you really want me to read.
-
- Cheers,
- Terry Bollinger
-
-
- "If the stone dogs in front of the old mansion
- hear thunder, they always run under the porch."
-
- --Example of a logically valid statement that
- demonstrates how a false premise ("stone dogs..
- hear thunder") leads to _any_ implication (if
- stone dogs can hear, why _not_ run, too?).
-
-