home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!nntp.uio.no!smaug!solan
- From: solan@smauguio.no (Svein Olav G. Nyberg)
- Subject: Re: QM
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.195455.26027@ulrik.uio.no>
- Sender: news@ulrik.uio.no (Mr News)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: smaug.uio.no
- Reply-To: solan@smauguio.no (Svein Olav G. Nyberg)
- Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
- References: <C17sFv.L03@umassd.edu>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1993 19:54:55 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <C17sFv.L03@umassd.edu>, pmsc13sg@UMASSD.EDU (Stephen
- Grossman) writes:
- |> Quantum mechanics-the mechanics of quanta
- |> Quanta-Nietzsche's active centers of energy, randomly combining into
- temporary
- |> entities
- |> mechanics-study of energy and entities
- |>
- |> QM-the probability of random energy
- |>
- |> When QM "scientists" stop sneakin' bits of reality and reason into their
- |> "science" they will light some incense, mumble the appropriate chant, and
- |> prostrate themselves before the ineffable. Ommmmmmmm.........
-
- As I wrote to Betsy, it is better to meet you with decent argument.
- I think the above is an example of a nonsensical letter. There is no
- argument, no support of any assertions, and even barely a statement.
- The only thing that is happening is that you are talking unsubstantiated
- nonsense about "scientists". I _might_ even agree to the sentiment
- behind what you have written, but what you have written is worthless.
- Objectively.
-
- Solan
-
-