home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!arnett
- From: arnett@unixg.ubc.ca (Bill Arnett)
- Newsgroups: rec.nude
- Subject: Re: New Hampshire Nude resort
- Date: 27 Jan 1993 01:05:02 GMT
- Organization: University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
- Lines: 28
- Message-ID: <1k4n3uINNm1d@skeena.ucs.ubc.ca>
- References: <an41134@pro-amber.cts.com> <1993Jan26.195632.6714@nntpd.lkg.dec.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: unixg.ubc.ca
-
- In article <1993Jan26.195632.6714@nntpd.lkg.dec.com> mack@jasmin.zko.dec.com (Ralph A. Mack) writes:
- >Cedar Waters Village (or CWV for those of us who know and love it).
- >
- >Restrictions
- >- the usual - no alcohol, no cameras, etc.
- >- more conservatively: no unpaired adults (with rare exceptions). I think
- > they've relaxed their restriction about unmarried couples during the day only.
-
- The usual???? Maybe I've been lucky enough to only visit "progressive"
- clubs. So far I haven't encountered a "no alcohol" rule and the rules
- regarding cameras were limits, not prohibitions. (i.e., no photos without
- the subjects' permission; no cameras by the pool; etc.) The only places
- I've been to that had "couples only" restrictions let me in anyway, even
- though I was travelling alone at the time.
-
- It doesn't surprise me that there are still clubs with all these rules,
- but I really hope "usual" is an exageration.
-
- As an aside: how would a club go about checking if you were a married
- or an unmarried couple? I was married for 5 years, but never had any
- paperwork to prove it---in Canada, common law marriage is legally
- equivalent to any other kind of marriage. Even if we had had a ceremony
- we still would have had different surnames afterward. So the only
- thing we could have proved was that we were room-mates.
-
- Cheers. Bill.
- --
- Bill Arnett Internet: arnett@unixg.ubc.ca
-