home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1993 #3 / NN_1993_3.iso / spool / rec / motorcyc / 45441 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1993-01-28  |  953 b 
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!enterpoop.mit.edu!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!gunning
  2. From: gunning@cco.caltech.edu (Kevin J. Gunning)
  3. Newsgroups: rec.motorcycles
  4. Subject: Re: CBR900RR
  5. Date: 27 Jan 1993 07:47:58 GMT
  6. Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
  7. Lines: 22
  8. Message-ID: <1k5eneINNt25@gap.caltech.edu>
  9. References: <1993Jan25.120014.21128@eua.ericsson.se> <C1FAsI.I7p@ccu.umanitoba.ca> <C1Gvx5.n3K@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil>
  10. NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu
  11.  
  12. In article <C1Gvx5.n3K@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil> dsc3jfs@nmrdc1.nmrdc.nnmc.navy.mil (Jim Small) writes:
  13. >
  14. >I was reading, somewhere, I don't remember, that the CBR900RR got better
  15. >gas mileage than the CBR600F2.  Any comments?
  16.  
  17. Who the f*ck cares?  Gas is approximately free.
  18.  
  19. >
  20. >Also, what's the time between servicing on both bikes?
  21.  
  22. About two sets of tires.  8-)
  23.  
  24. >
  25. >---
  26. >Slowly thinking about a possible future steed . . . 
  27. >
  28. You want one.  
  29. >
  30.  
  31. kjg
  32.  
  33.  
  34.