home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!ogicse!hp-cv!hp-pcd!hpcvaac!billn
- From: billn@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com (bill nelson)
- Newsgroups: rec.models.rockets
- Subject: Re: Igniters
- Message-ID: <1993Jan26.145748.3731@hpcvaac.cv.hp.com>
- Date: 26 Jan 93 14:57:48 GMT
- Article-I.D.: hpcvaac.1993Jan26.145748.3731
- References: <636@rml.UUCP>
- Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company, Corvallis, Oregon USA
- Lines: 30
-
- jack@rml.UUCP (jack hagerty) writes:
- :
- : >Anything of any use in the articles, you could easily obtain by making a
- : >5 minute phone call to the manufacturer.
- :
- : Ah, but how impartial would *they* be :^)
-
- If the articles had contained anything useful, then I would agree. However, we
- have to judge by what was there - I saw nothing that a manufacturer would not
- have been willing to supply.
-
- Note that the voltage applied tells us very little. We don't even know if
- that is sufficient voltage drop, across the ignitor, to cause it to ignite.
- All we know is that this is a minimum value - practical values are likely
- to be higher. How much, we cannot determine, because he did not tell us about
- his test setup.
-
- Now, this problem could have been eliminated very simply. All he would have
- had to do was measure the circuit current. Then, it does not matter how the
- resistances of the circuit may be distributed. You know that, if a certain
- current flows, then the ignitor will function.
-
- Also, testing for 'eventual' ignition is also not very useful. I have not
- read the 1192 rewrite recently, but the proposed NFPA 1197 for High Power
- Rocketry mentions that liftoff will occur within 3 seconds after applying
- power to the ignitor. As such, a more realistic test would be that the
- ignitor provided its maximum energy output within one second of current
- application.
-
- Bill
-