home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.games.bridge
- Path: sparky!uunet!gatech!destroyer!cs.ubc.ca!unixg.ubc.ca!ucla-mic!ucla-cs!matthew
- From: matthew@base.cs.ucla.edu (Matthew Merzbacher)
- Subject: Re: What to do when the rules conflict?
- Message-ID: <matthew.727651837@base.cs.ucla.edu>
- Sender: usenet@cs.ucla.edu (Mr Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: lynn.cs.ucla.edu
- Organization: UCLA, Computer Science Department
- References: <1993Jan21.140619.19502@midway.uchicago.edu> <1jml68INNdr7@transfer.stratus.com>
- Date: 21 Jan 93 21:30:37 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- tnh@sw.stratus.com (Tim Hill) writes:
-
- >I suppose you have agreements concerning at least these three auctions:
-
- > 1C-2C(natural)-P
- > 1C-2C(majors)-P
- > 1C-2C(no agreement)-P
-
- >I also gather that the meanings of pass in those three auctions are
- >overlapping but not identical. If so, partner gave you the unauthorized
- >information that he has a pass in any of these auctions, so your future
- >bids and plays are restricted by Law 16A!
-
- Not necessarily. Partner may have read their card (more thoroughly) before
- bidding and thus knew what their defense was to 1C. Perhaps the opponents
- had only filled out one card, and it was on partner's side of the table,
- and you were late for the round, and...
- --
-
- Matthew Merzbacher ARPA: matthew@CS.UCLA.EDU
- Moo - Moo Moo UUCP: ...!{uunet|rutgers|ucbvax}!cs.ucla.edu!matthew
- This time, *with* the oys
-