home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!nntp.Stanford.EDU!tedebear
- From: tedebear@leland.Stanford.EDU (Theodore Chen)
- Subject: Re: LX DX XT XTR Confusion
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.071341.1606@leland.Stanford.EDU>
- Sender: news@leland.Stanford.EDU (Mr News)
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- References: <christog.727485603@sfu.ca> <2B5D9680.3653@news.service.uci.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 93 07:13:41 GMT
- Lines: 8
-
- In article <2B5D9680.3653@news.service.uci.edu> schwarz@nucleus.ps.uci.edu (Randy Schwarz) writes:
- >Shimano did a confusing thing this year. they reorganized the groupos.
- >in 92 LX sucked. This year the LX groupo is a nice set of components.
-
- what's bad about the '92 LX group? is it related to durability or
- to function?
-
- -teddy
-