home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!bnrgate!bmerh85!bnr.ca!paynter
- From: paynter@bnr.ca (Stuart Paynter)
- Subject: Re: LX DX XT XTR Confusion
- Message-ID: <1993Jan21.125417.24725@bmerh85.bnr.ca>
- Sender: news@bmerh85.bnr.ca (Usenet News)
- Reply-To: paynter@bnr.ca (Stuart Paynter)
- Organization: Bell-Northern Research Ltd.
- References: <1jjg2eINNpre@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <1993Jan20.202728.13983@datamark.co.nz>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jan 93 12:54:17 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1993Jan20.202728.13983@datamark.co.nz>, thomas@datamark.co.nz (Thomas Beagle) writes:
- |> In article <1jjg2eINNpre@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> ce011@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (Scott Erdman) writes:
- |> >
- |> >According to my friend who is a mountain biking enthuiast:
- |> >
- |> >The components are ranked from lowest to hightest :
- |> >
- |> >DX, LX, XT, XTR
- |>
- |> So, where does CX fit in all of this?
-
- I think that CX is the hybrid-specific groupset (if my memory serves me
- correctly).
-
- Stu
-