home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!info-high-audio-request
- From: mrbill@leland.Stanford.EDU (William Bowen)
- Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
- Subject: Re: HOW GOOD ARE TDK MA-X CASSETTES?
- Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 03:12:02 GMT
- Organization: DSG, Stanford University, CA 94305, USA
- Lines: 16
- Approved: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
- Message-ID: <1jov30INN50@uwm.edu>
- References: <1jeojsINN7qd@uwm.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: 129.89.7.4
- Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
-
- In article <1jeojsINN7qd@uwm.edu> tranhun1@elof.iit.edu (Hung Q. Tran) writes:
- >I recently bought a box of 10 TDK Ma-x blank tapes and i have yet
- >to record from them? How good are they? What is the difference between
- >ma-x and sa-x and also to the ma-xg which was for $8-11 i think.
- >the box was for $29 in New York's Chinatown. How does it compare
- >with Metal Select from Sony.
-
- See the review of 88 tapes in the March 1990 issue of Audio. Metal tapes are
- in general significantly better than type II tapes in just about every
- relevant parameter.
-
- Regards,
-
- Bill
- mrbill@leland.stanford.edu
-
-