home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!gnu.ai.mit.edu!rms
- From: rms@gnu.ai.mit.edu (Richard Stallman)
- Newsgroups: gnu.gcc.bug
- Subject: gcc 2.3.3's handling of setjmp like functions
- Date: 22 Jan 1993 21:11:25 -0500
- Organization: GNUs Not Usenet
- Lines: 9
- Sender: daemon@cis.ohio-state.edu
- Approved: bug-gcc@prep.ai.mit.edu
- Distribution: gnu
- Message-ID: <9301220819.AA21461@mole.gnu.ai.mit.edu>
- References: <9301192328.AA17335@thokk.think.com>
-
- However, considering the number of machines to which gcc has been
- ported and the likelihood of missing some functions, shouldn't there be a
- way to declare that a function is `setjmp-like'? Possibly via a pragma
- so that it could be put into the appropriate header files?
-
- It might be reasonable to have a way of doing this, but I don't
- like the idea of using pragma for it. (Or for anything.)
- Any other ideas?
-
-