home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit:1362 biz.sco.general:5648 comp.unix.sys5.r3:436 comp.unix.sysv386:17925
- Newsgroups: comp.unix.pc-clone.32bit,biz.sco.general,comp.unix.sys5.r3,comp.unix.sysv386
- Path: sparky!uunet!peora!gator!larry
- From: larry@trauma.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
- Subject: Re: PC Unix/Xenix vendors
- Message-ID: <C1JFEq.I48@trauma.rn.com>
- Organization: Gator Communications - Feeds-R-Us 219-289-3745
- References: <C1D9uo.BuE@ddsw1.mcs.com> <1993Jan24.230151.8266@sbcs.sunysb.edu> <1993Jan27.084106.19985@jonlab.UUCP>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 00:16:01 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
- jon@jonlab.UUCP (Jon LaBadie) writes:
-
- >In fact, I question the stability issue. It is my "SUBJECTIVE"
- >impression that there are many more discussions of problems with
- >SCO UNIX that other flavors. Yes, they have a larger installed
- >base, but from the breadth of problems, I don't think that is the
- >sole reason. Again, just an impression from reading netnews,
- >not hands on experience.
-
- It could be that a higher percentage of SCO users are less
- Unix educated than other Unix users?
-
- Or it could be that SCO is so highly modified that standard
- reference book examples don't work with SCO
-
- Or, the SCO users don't read manuals.
-
- --
- Larry Snyder internet: larry@gator.use.com
- keeper of the Gator uucp: uunet!gator!larry
-