home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!digex.com!intercon!udel!bogus.sura.net!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!cs.utexas.edu!bcm!lib!mdarpi1.mda.uth.tmc.edu!draper
- From: draper@odin.mda.uth.tmc.edu (E.J. Draper)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
- Subject: The DEATH of HyperCard and Don Crabb
- Message-ID: <8572@lib.tmc.edu>
- Date: 27 Jan 1993 18:01:48 GMT
- Sender: usenet@lib.tmc.edu
- Organization: U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- Lines: 78
- Nntp-Posting-Host: mdarpi1.mda.uth.tmc.edu
- X-UserAgent: Nuntius v1.1.1d17
- X-XXMessage-ID: <A78C286E2402019A@mdarpi1.mda.uth.tmc.edu>
- X-XXDate: Wed, 27 Jan 93 17:54:22 GMT
-
-
- In article <1993Jan26.212701.13373@nmsu.edu> GRUBB, bgrubb@dante.nmsu.edu
- writes:
- >Well I read about the hiatus {death} of HyperCard in MacWeek and now I
- find
- >out that a program was developed to transfer SuperCard projects to
- HyperCard
- >because Aldus is looking to sale SuperCard. Now where the %^$#*& do we
- go?
-
- That article, from Don (Fatman) Crabb, was one of the most absurd
- features I've ever read in MacWeek. But it never ceases to amaze me how
- much of an impact such blatant nonsense can make on an industry.
-
- Example:
- I just returned from a meeting with one of our physicians who had clipped
- the article out of MacWeek to give to me. After reading this article he
- was *very* concerned about using HyperCard in current and future
- products. I had quite a job on my hands in trying to convince him that
- everything was okay. I'm sure there are plenty of other people around the
- world that have been put in a similar position. These are some of the
- points I made when I discussed the article with him:
-
- = GENERAL POINTS =
-
- 1) Claris has done an ABYSMAL job at maintaining ALL their products. The
- only product that's been even remotely properly updated has been
- FileMaker. If you think they've done a terrible job with HyperCard, ask
- yourself about the fabled MacWrite Pro, or MacPaint or MacProject.
-
- 2) The people in HyperCard marketing don't realize how important the
- "strategic leak" is. People in the industry count on these little
- tidbits of data to help them make decisions about product direction.
- Claris has been dead silent about HyperCard for far too long. As of
- right now, I don't think they have any idea how INCREDIBLY important it
- is to make a public announcement about the direction of HyperCard. Right
- now, vaporware is far superior to the black void we all are facing.
-
- 3) Why on earth would Apple want to give away source code to one of the
- most revolutionary products in the software industry? Is Crabb out of
- his mind?
-
- 4) His idea about selling the source to Danny Goodman or Dan Shafer was
- utterly preposterous. These people are writers, they are not high powered
- businessmen. They don't even begin to have to resources it would take to
- develop and market HyperCard.
-
- = INACCURACIES =
-
- 1) AppleScript != HyperTalk. HyperTalk is a scripting language,
- AppleScript is a technology. AppleScript is not syntax dependent, for
- example, you can use UserTalk (Frontier's scripting language) to write
- AppleScript "scripts." Crabb uses AppleScript and HyperTalk
- interchangeably.
-
- 2) The entire article stems from a one misplaced presupposition, that
- being, that HyperCard will "die." No evidence of this impending "death"
- was provided by Crabb.
-
- 3) HyperCard already supports APIs to other languages. It always has.
- You can write externals in everything from BASIC to assembler to Pascal,
- FORTRAN and C.
-
- 4) HyperCard already supports Multimedia extensions in the form of above
- XCMDs.
-
- = SUMMARY =
-
- Besides his support of Nisus, Crabb's column has always been something of
- an annoyance to me. He is frequently inaccurate and generally his
- rantings are best ignored. I think MacWeek should look for someone else
- to fill his editorial space.
-
-
- |E|J- ED DRAPER
- rEpar|D|<- Radiologic/Pathologic Institute
- The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
- draper@odin.mda.uth.tmc.edu
-