home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!ray
- From: ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer)
- Subject: Re: PowerPC and the '060, paths and speed?
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.204149.7455@netcom.com>
- Keywords: bits, mips, whatever
- Organization: Netcom. San Jose, California
- References: <4bh39tl@rpi.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 20:41:49 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- mortea@rpi.edu writes ...
- > 1. What are the mip ratings supposed to be for the first of each
- > line?(I've heard various numbers for both)
-
- MIP = Meaningless Indicator of Performance. Suffice it to say that
- both can be roughly 4 times as fast as the current Quadras. More
- acurate number are, by the way, irrelevent. CPU MIP ratings are also
- irrelevent (as an example compare the IIvx and the IIci).
-
- > 2. What are the data path widths in bits of both going to be?
-
- Probably 32.
-
- > 3. If a chip is super scalar does that mean that it can be
- > parallelled easily? If so, what kind of performance
- > improvement could that give?
-
- No. Parallelization (I went to Stanford to learn that word. It doesn't
- turn out to be anywhere near as useful as you might expect.) is much
- more a software issue than it is a hardware issue. The 68020 had
- support for parallel processing. See many multi-CPU Macs around?
-
- Superscalar mean that the CPU is smart enough to execute two instructions
- at the same time when they don't conflict with each other. That means
- two instruction pipelines.
-
- Parallelizing CPUs can potentially lead to 1000 fold speed increases.
- As yet, success towards that goal had been somewhat limited. Also note
- that having two CPUs is a lot more expensive. If you really need the
- performance, you should be looking at a workstation.
-
- --
- Ray Fischer "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth
- ray@netcom.com than lies." -- Friedrich Nietszsche
-