home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hardware
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!decwrl!spool.mu.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!The-Star.honeywell.com!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!ray
- From: ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer)
- Subject: Re: Motorola's 68060 for the Mac
- Message-ID: <1993Jan24.200341.3236@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom. San Jose, California
- References: <mhk=Av+@engin.umich.edu> <noah-200193075654@noah.apple.com> <WAGNER.93Jan21091430@grace.math.uh.edu>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 20:03:41 GMT
- Lines: 16
-
- wagner@grace.math.uh.edu (David Wagner) writes ...
- >Clearly a processor can run faster if it can keep data in registers
- >rather than writing values out to memory and reading them back in
- >again when needed. Cache helps in this regard, but not quite as much
- >as registers.
-
- Not necessarily. There is a point where either 1) you can't use more
- registers, or 2) saving and restoring registers starts taking up too
- much time, or 3) the extra bits needed to address the registers slows
- down the CPU by requiring extra memory fetches for instruction data.
- It's a bit of a tradeoff. More registers is not always a good idea.
- Generally 8-32 seems to be the most effective number.
-
- --
- Ray Fischer "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth
- ray@netcom.com than lies." -- Friedrich Nietszsche
-