home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky comp.ai.philosophy:7367 sci.philosophy.tech:4931
- Path: sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!b63519.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu!dpn2
- From: dpn2@po.CWRU.Edu (Damien P. Neil)
- Newsgroups: comp.ai.philosophy,sci.philosophy.tech
- Subject: Re: Searle on animal consciousness
- Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1993 16:08:29 GMT
- Organization: Case Western Reserve University
- Lines: 18
- Message-ID: <dpn2.232.727891709@po.CWRU.Edu>
- References: <1993Jan24.024230.5977@sophia.smith.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: b63519.student.cwru.edu
-
- In article <1993Jan24.024230.5977@sophia.smith.edu> orourke@sophia.smith.edu (Joseph O'Rourke) writes:
- >Searle says that "it seems to me a well-attested empirical fact
- >that dogs are conscious." [The Rediscovery of the Mind, p.74.]
- >I haven't read much about animal consciousness, and I would
- >be interested to hear the opinions of various philosophers on
- >the topic. Is it as uncontroversial as Searle implies?
-
- I very much doubt it. My freshman philosophy teacher maintained that humans
- are the only self-aware creatures on the planet, and that we perceive
- conciousness in animals because we tend to judge all things by ourselves.
-
- Personally, I considered this to be utter nonsense. Personally, I feel that
- the argument that my cat is concious is as sound as the argument that my
- roommate is concious. (Actually, he isn't right now. He's sleeping. :-)
- -----
- Damien Neil dpn2@po.cwru.edu "Until somebody debugs reality, the best
- Case Western Reserve University I can do is a quick patch here and there."
- CMPS/EEAP double majoring masochist - Erik Green
-