home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Comments: Gated by NETNEWS@AUVM.AMERICAN.EDU
- Path: sparky!uunet!uvaarpa!darwin.sura.net!news.udel.edu!udel!gatech!paladin.american.edu!auvm!UGA.BITNET!CMSPSY20
- Message-ID: <PSYCGRAD%93012812031094@ACADVM1.UOTTAWA.CA>
- Newsgroups: bit.listserv.psycgrad
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 11:58:03 EST
- Sender: Psychology Graduate Students Discussion Group List
- <PSYCGRAD@UOTTAWA.BITNET>
- From: barry <CMSPSY20@UGA.BITNET>
- Subject: Re: Ethics
- In-Reply-To: Message of Thu,
- 28 Jan 1993 10:17:45 -0500 from <szikopou@CCS.CARLETON.CA>
- Lines: 11
-
- Publish or perish, per se, is not the problem. As I see it, the problem
- is composed of two (perhaps inseparable) components. First there is the
- p & p component. But compounding the problem significantly is the fact
- that the journals and other avenues refuse to publish non-significant
- results. Seems to me that the development of a "true science" is as much
- predicated on wide dissemination of what doesn't work as it is on the
- wide dissemination of what does work.
-
- Another $.02
-
- barry
-